The Effective Measurement of Dynamic Internal Compliance of Vascular Grafts
25th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Proceedings, 22, (1990)
J. C. Conti, Ph.D., E. R. Strope, Ph.D., D. J. Rohde
Dynatek Laboratories, Inc., Galena, MO
Introduction
The clinical importance of matching the compliance of a
vascular graft to the host vessel has been a point of contention for
many years (ref.). One possible explanation for this unsettled
controversy could be that the compliance determinations used to
evaluate compliance/patency correlations were improperly
performed. Over the past 8 years we have tested all the
published techniques with the resulting conclusion that they are
all less than ideal.
Techniques designed to determine the compliance of vascular
grafts or natural arteries vary from the use of a cantilever arm to
optical analysis. All previously available procedures required the
adoption of at least one of the following assumptions:
A. External compliance accurately reflects internal compliance and
therefore there is no wall compression.
B. There is no measurable longitudinal compliance.
C. Touching the vessel or graft does not alter the measurement.
D. Dynamic and static compliances are similar in magnitude.
The injected volume dynamic internal compliance technique
presented here requires none of these assumptions. It is a
straightforward and easy to understand procedure that is
accurate and reproducible.
Although
in vitro measurements are quite simple,
in vivo determinations are still complicated by uncontrolled experimental variables.
Utility of Compliance Measurements
A. Speed of Durability Testing
Since most viscoelastic materials have three dimensional
compliances that are a function of
speed, it is important to evaluate the highest rate of
inflation that a device can experience while still
responding with the same geometrical perturbation
that would occur at biologically relevant speeds.
Most vascular grafts appear to become rigid at
inflation rates greater than 1000 per minute.
Testing above this initial speed would actually
result in less distention per cycle and may
understress the sample.
B. Durability Monitoring
By comparing pre- and post-fatigue three
dimensional compliance, investigators have an
internal standard that they can use to monitor any
changes that might develop during high speed
durability testing.
C. Biological Protocol
1)
In Vivo - Until further refinements are
achieved, we believe a true
in vivo
compliance determination is not yet available.
2) Although compliance matching will probably be important in the long run,
the aforementioned technical shortcomings render true matching unlikely
at this time.
Techniques
Since the results of compliance determinations are
related to the degree of stretch that a graft or vessel
is experiencing, two easily repeated protocols were
designed. The first gradually adjusts the stretching
tension until a point is just reached where the graft
does not change length during each pulse. The
other adjusts the tension until the actual radial
compliance is maximized.
Finally, a protocol was designed to allow for the use
of inserts when a porous graft is tested.
Approach
An instrument was developed that allows for the
pulsatile injection of precisely controlled volumes of
experimental fluids into vascular grafts or excised
biological vessels while simultaneously monitoring
the vessel length and inside pressure. This
eliminates all of the assumptions that normally are
required during compliance determinations. By
evaluating the initial and final volumes of the grafts,
the resultant dynamic change in radius can be
simply and accurately determined.
Results of Dynamic Testing
A 4mm polyurethane graft was tested at various
speeds between 80 and 120mmHg. The following
results indicate a clear dependence of compliance
on speed of testing.
Speed (cpm) 1 100 200 400 800 1600 2000
% compliance * 3.33 3.33 3.33 2.85 2.22 1.76
* too much creep to measure.
Summary
The injected volume approach to the determination
of dynamic internal compliance is simple,
reproducible and highly accurate. It does not
require the aforementioned assumptions nor does it
utilize complicated mathematics or instrumentation.
It does not yet, however, solve many of the
problems associated with
in vivo determinations
necessary for compliance matching. These
experimental difficulties are currently being
addressed.
References
1. Abbott, W.M., et. al., Effect of Compliance Mismatch on
Vascular Graft Patency,
J. Vasc. Surg.; 1987 Feb. 5(2) p376-
82.
2. Kidson, I.G., The Effect of Wall Mechanical Properties on
Patency of
Arterial Grafts., Annals of The Royal College of
Surgeons, 1983 Jan. 65(1) p24-9.
3. Lyman, D.J., et. al., Compliance as a Factor Effecting the
Patency of
a Copolyurethane Vascular Graft., J. Biomed.
Mat. Res., 1978 May 12(3) p337-45.
Dynatek Laboratories, Inc., Fourth and Main, PO Box 254,
Galena, MO 65656